<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony confirms our suspicions about OS memory footprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/</link>
	<description>The home of your PlayStation education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: forex robot</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-22483</link>
		<dc:creator>forex robot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-22483</guid>
		<description>My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My cousin recommended this blog and she was totally right keep up the fantastic work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SonyJunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12775</link>
		<dc:creator>SonyJunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12775</guid>
		<description>@starspeed and anyone who says catching up to the 360. It really will not make a whole difference. They will be able to do some things. They seem to be fine with what they had, so they should honestly use the extra for in-game music, faster in-game, and things of that such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@starspeed and anyone who says catching up to the 360. It really will not make a whole difference. They will be able to do some things. They seem to be fine with what they had, so they should honestly use the extra for in-game music, faster in-game, and things of that such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StarSpeed</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12770</link>
		<dc:creator>StarSpeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12770</guid>
		<description>Its good that they reduced the amount of memory used by the OS because now games can have more memory to use.  Sony decrease of OS memory usage make it on par with Microsoft Xbox 360 memory usage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good that they reduced the amount of memory used by the OS because now games can have more memory to use.  Sony decrease of OS memory usage make it on par with Microsoft Xbox 360 memory usage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coolsalajr</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12465</link>
		<dc:creator>coolsalajr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12465</guid>
		<description>catching up on 360</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>catching up on 360</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Steen</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12423</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Steen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 13:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12423</guid>
		<description>Exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moocows111111</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12341</link>
		<dc:creator>Moocows111111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12341</guid>
		<description>@Patrick Steen Oh I see now, with this upgrade, the game developers would have more RAM to use to operate their games?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick Steen Oh I see now, with this upgrade, the game developers would have more RAM to use to operate their games?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottspeed</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-2/#comment-12272</link>
		<dc:creator>scottspeed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12272</guid>
		<description>anything giving the developers more freedom is a good thing. wonder whether they can reduce it further?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything giving the developers more freedom is a good thing. wonder whether they can reduce it further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Steen</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-1/#comment-12268</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Steen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12268</guid>
		<description>@Dreamer_Lion - I&#039;ve explained quite a bit of this in my previous article - but Sony has been able to reduce the OS&#039;s memory footprint exactly because of extra XMB features. They set the memory high, as they weren&#039;t sure what they would need it for, now they know, so have assigned memory (whilst optimising) and can cut it back and give it back to developers.

@taus90 - This has little to do with Arc - the memory footprint has been reduced since day one. Why this has come up now, is beyond me.

@Dr. Moogle - It makes a world of difference. Developers fight for 5mb of RAM with optimisation, so 70MB is huge - but it didn&#039;t come all at once!

@Dkenair @Moocows111111 - The hardware has not changed, it&#039;s the same amount of memory - but around 100mb used to be cut off from developers (used to run the system&#039;s operating system...XMB) so now much of this memory has been given back =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dreamer_Lion &#8211; I&#8217;ve explained quite a bit of this in my previous article &#8211; but Sony has been able to reduce the OS&#8217;s memory footprint exactly because of extra XMB features. They set the memory high, as they weren&#8217;t sure what they would need it for, now they know, so have assigned memory (whilst optimising) and can cut it back and give it back to developers.</p>
<p>@taus90 &#8211; This has little to do with Arc &#8211; the memory footprint has been reduced since day one. Why this has come up now, is beyond me.</p>
<p>@Dr. Moogle &#8211; It makes a world of difference. Developers fight for 5mb of RAM with optimisation, so 70MB is huge &#8211; but it didn&#8217;t come all at once!</p>
<p>@Dkenair @Moocows111111 &#8211; The hardware has not changed, it&#8217;s the same amount of memory &#8211; but around 100mb used to be cut off from developers (used to run the system&#8217;s operating system&#8230;XMB) so now much of this memory has been given back =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Moogle</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-1/#comment-12251</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Moogle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 05:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12251</guid>
		<description>@taus90: good point!

but really tho, im not too savvy with this stuff...but how much more can you put in with taht extra 70mb of ram?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@taus90: good point!</p>
<p>but really tho, im not too savvy with this stuff&#8230;but how much more can you put in with taht extra 70mb of ram?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taus90</title>
		<link>http://www.psuni.com/sony-confirms-our-suspicions-about-os-memory-footprint-2670/comment-page-1/#comment-12249</link>
		<dc:creator>taus90</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playstationuniversity.com/?p=2670#comment-12249</guid>
		<description>maybe they want to reduce footprint, so that when Arc arrives it should not be a burden on the ram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe they want to reduce footprint, so that when Arc arrives it should not be a burden on the ram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

